The BridgeMaven | 17: A Trump Demotion
1800
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-1800,single-format-standard,ajax_updown_fade,page_not_loaded,,large,shadow3

17: A Trump Demotion

08 Nov 2013, by abbiefeuer in Bridge Bites

If you’ve seen Bridge Bites 14, 15 and 16 then by now you are familiar with trump promotions.  They are not so difficult once you get the hang of them, but it takes real talent to organize a trump demotion!  We are putting you in the West seat and it is your job to avoid this ignominious fate.

E-W Vulnerable

17 Bridge Bite Hand

Against suit contracts, leading a suit headed by the Ace-King is a relatively safe occupation.  Nowadays most players lead Ace from Ace-King.  That being the case, what would it mean if you switched the order and led the King followed by the Ace?

If your partnership agreement is to lead Ace from Ace-King, then leading the King followed by the Ace shows a doubleton.  That’s exactly what you have in Hearts, so should your opening lead be the King?

If you show a doubleton Heart by cashing them out of order, and if you then cross to Partner’s (hoped-for) A, she might reasonably play another Heart.  What would be so terrible about that?

Have you noticed that there is an alarming absence of trumps in your hand?  To see the tragedy that will unfold if you play K, then A, then a Diamond, take a look at the full diagram …

When East is in with the A, he returns a Heart, and there is point in Declarer ruffing high, that is guaranteed to lose the contract by promoting a trump trick for the opponents.  So, Declarer ruffs resignedly with the Nine, expecting to be overruffed.  But, no, that doesn’t happen, so Declarer crosses to Dummy and double finesses East out of his Queen-Jack of trumps!  Of course, if the play in Hearts hadn’t telegraphed the trump holding then Declarer would have played trumps from the top, going down one on the unlucky 3-0 split.

OK, which defender was to blame for this “trump demotion”?

West might have played the Ace then the King of Hearts, supposedly showing more than two of them, on the grounds that there was no point in showing a doubleton without any trumps to ruff with.  On the other hand, picture East with J9x and Declarer with AKQ8xxx.  Now, assuming 2-1 trumps (the 78% case), Declarer will expect that he can afford to ruff the third Heart high.  So, West’s play could have worked with a different layout.

 East could certainly have done better by not playing the third round of Hearts, he knows for sure that he will score the setting trick with his QJ3 unless something untoward happens.  But a suspicious Declarer, smelling a rat, will wonder why not.  If she gives E-W credit for not having a carding misunderstanding, and if she also credits East for actually being awake, then she might smell a rat and cross to Dummy for a double Spade finesse.  Declarer may be up to making that brave play, but the very least that East can do is put her to the test.

This post is courtesy of: BRIDGE BITES from the American Contract Bridge League by Brian Gunnell

NO COMMENT

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.